.Intelligent editorial
educates within the parameters of
absolute accuracy and reason.
Treaties, summits, bureaucratic entanglements, wars, terrorism, scandals, global tragedies, high
finance, legislative maneuverings, espionage, rights, international intrigue, corporate license, constitutional
violations, religious controversies, legal matters, rebellions, taxation, political wranglings, technological
hyperdrive, privileges, sensitive patterns of social change
...no vital topic is off-limits!
Courageous, diplomatic presentations of wisdom
are the entirety of purposeful commentary.
Just the facts... for mere
opinion is inadequate to the task, even when carefully considered, given that only the truth
can enlighten ...and nothing more.
The term "Right" originally meant and, therefore,
means "correct", as in "the right way" because those on the right end of the political spectrum were devoted to the
literal parameters of the Constitution, as "blessed by God". All political tenets to the left of the extreme
Right are based upon unconstitutional precepts, such as a "liberal interpretation" of the Constitution of the United States
of America, given that the term "liberal interpretation" does not mathematically equal ( = ) the term "literal definition".
To wit, a period ( . ) at the end of any sentence literally means ", this statement is complete as stated, subject and predicate
included." As such, each full statement within the Constitution is complete, punctuation included.
Each and every political tenet which is left
of the extreme Right is literally ( = ) unconstitutional and Leftist, including the politically Moderate tenet, the precept
of which is "socialism in moderation". Centrists are devotees of popular public opinion
at a given moment, despite any conflicting personal convictions which they might hold. Progressives are Liberals,
given that true progression is afforded by the right to "amend" the Constitution if and when it is necessary (essential to
life) to do so.
Despite liberal interpretations to the contrary, NAFTA and
all subsequent Free Trade Agreements are technically ( = ) unconstitutional, given that they are the antithesis of Constitutional
Law as signed by our Forefathers; revenues were anticipated (and, therefore, sanctified by Constitutional
Law) from the importation of goods from foreign lands.
Socio-Democracy is a misnomer and technically, therefore,
does not exist, given that democracy is not socialism. As such,
all self-proclaimed "Social-Democrats" are, technically, Socialists and/or proponents of Socialism.
.
.
OUR ENDANGERED ECONOMY
Senior Policy Analyst: Jane Smith
Date: October 1, 2008
Do you find it odd that the Washington "insiders" believe The Holy Bible where it states "the poor will always be with
us", yet, they do not believe it where it states "Defraud not", "...pay a man his wages on that day", and "do not charge usury
[interest]?" Such selective reasoning has lead to the exclusion of the long-term and chronically unemployed from the
economic health indices. Yet, until the true unemployment rates are included within the economic indices formulae, the
results will be slanted and biased and the results diabolical.
Our economy, as we know it, is in extreme danger. In fact, the entire nation is in
danger of increasing infiltration by The New World Order, at the hands of well-intentioned, yet, insufficiently informed liberals
and moderates.
It all began in 1933. The New Order [Time-Life Book], Hitler's step-by-step plan to socialize, then, nationalize
Germany, Europe, and, ultimately, the world, was beginning to display it's venom to an unsuspecting public. Fast forward
to the United Nations, another well-intentioned vehicle for the distribution of whatever NAZI influences remained following
World War II. The United States Government allowed "diplomatic immunities" and, later, dual citizenships, such that
foreign persons, entities, and governments could own American real estate and companies.
The United States Government, later, abandoned it's Buy American philosophy. American businesses began flocking out
of the country in search of "slave" labor. Thus, the shoe, textile, and steel industries darted abroad, followed by
a wide variety of other manufacturers.
In the mid-1980's, rumors of a Free Trade Agreement spawned a massive behind-the-scenes exodus plan by American businesses,
in order to take advantage of the extremely low wages being paid abroad ...I know, I sat in on some of their meetings.
NAFTA was passed, in an effort to afford American businesses the opportunity to sell their wares within formerly protected
foreign lands, and vice versa.
In 1990, a particular United Nations Resolution was passed by Congress and signed into law by George Bush Senior, which
"grants any group or individual, foreign or domestic, armed or unarmed, uniformed
or un-uniformed, the right to enter into any American home, without warrant, and confiscate all weapons,
without recourse in any court of law, including the World Court" [C-Span, January 1990].
Naturally, this is only one of a series of Resolutions which automatically undermined the sovereignty of, and , thus, effectively
dismantled, the true United States of America, yet, it is illustrative of the direction of that which George Bush Senior,
that year, called "The New World Order". The back-lash, that year, lead to the Government calling the New World Order,
instead, "International Government."
The banking industry lobbyists succeeded in convincing the United States Congress, as well as a variety of foreign governments,
to de-regulate the banking industry. Interest rates, which had been stationary below 19% (because 20% used to be considered
loan-sharking Mafia-style by the United States Government), were now increasing with each late payment to 22%, then, 29%,
33%, 44%, 104+%, et caetera, in addition to late fees and other value added fees. "Buybacks" on home mortgages became
a fancy term for renting your own home, for life, from the bank. "Adjustable Interest Rates" became common and, with
the decreasing wages and jobs resulting from NAFTA, cost-prohibitive.
Now, the banking industry lobbyists convinced Congress and W. that bailing them out, rather than
establishing reasonable interest rates, is wise. Yet, the interest rates which they were charging were thin air until
paid. They had no intrinsic value for they had no logical basis, so why should Congress have paid for them? The
companies loaned in order to sell the loans. No corporate president wanted to purchase at the high end of the rate scale.
Why should the Government have done so? The business owners and their law-writing lobbyists are not stupid. They
know that it is all a scam. Does Congress? And if not, why not?
Lobbyists are doling out $5,000 checks at "teaching sessions" prior to the induction of each new set of Congressmen/women
...proudly "teaching them how business is conducted in Washington.[C-Span]" Hmmmm, telling.
I have, yet, to see our Ethics Committee become involved in resolving that particular quasi-constitutional [read: technically
(=) unconstitutional] system.
This year, French President Nicolas Sarkozy spoke before the United Nations, lauding "The New World Order". Both
Obama and McCain, as candidates for the Presidency of the United States, followed his lead. However, if we continue
upon this dangerous track, we will lose all that America once was, replaced by full-out National-Socialism,
with the Father/Motherland elsewhere ...maybe, within the Dominican Republic of
the United Nations, which will, by then, be severed from all American authority.
Do not bother to believe that Washington would never allow such a thing to happen. It ishappening, right before your very eyes. You need only be objective and aware of that which our
officials within Washington are doing, distinct from that which they are saying.
Despite the liberal slant [liberal, rather than literal, parameters of the Constitution] of the top
10% of the American populace who are, now, living constantly within legislated loopholes, the average American realizes
that Americans cannot afford ANY more tax increases, wage decreases, interest increases, job losses, price increases, and
corporate bailouts. The Washington bureaucrats need to cease relying upon banking lobbyists for their information and
rely, rather, upon good old-fashioned common sense ...for a change.
We want America back!
[Please, note that this article was written before it became obvious that Barack Obama would win the upcoming election.
Mr. Obama has, since, nationalized a number of American corporations, dramatically increased bail-out monies for large
financial institutions, and expanded socialistic programs within America.]