State of the Art

By Department:
Women
Men
Children
Puppy People And All
Accessorize
Life Style
Beauty and Fragrance
Health
Sporting
Office
Finance
Investments
Gifting
Automotive
Travel
Corporate Policy

Doctor Benjamin Franklin
Doctor Benjamin Franklin

Plato and Aristotle
Plato and Aristotle

State of the Art Technologies Analysis

Technology Literacy Within Twenty-First Century America

Artificial Intelligence is the pinnacle of State of the Art Technologies and it's members the elite among the scientific community.  Thus, at the very least, you want to develop your fluency in C#, LISP, Python, and to earn an MCSE Certificate, so that you will be able to join this corps of elites.

Python is the language used by NASA  while LISP is the favored language among the most elite within the Artificial Intelligence community ...both for their flexibility and comprehensiveness. C# is basic computer programming language, today.  MCSE opens career doors and opportunities within reputable companies.

As transferrable skills, easy design languages which provide elaborate applications, and basic understanding of multi-processing languages, these languages will hold anyone in high esteem within the global marketplace, throughout his or her career.

Competitive students from Japan, India, China, France, et caetera, are learning to design their own programming languages.  As such, rather than following suit, you will want to develop great flexibility in your interpretation and translation skills. Even so, such innovative languages as theirs will not eclipse the value of LISP to AI.

Being able to program multi-processors is, probably, the most valuable of professional skills. Governments, inter-agency groups, and international businesses are relying, increasingly, upon such programs, and enormous businesses are willing to pay premium wages and perquisites for those who can generate quick turnover of such technologies into large profits. Vivien, Ph.D. Electrical Engineering, Oxford, was imported, and nearly granted a blank check for her skills, by an American company!  In 1965, a neighbor designed a hardware system for IBM, for which he, then, received a monthly stipend of $7,000 ...for life!  Today, such contracts are being tendered within the software industry, instead.

The key to succeeding within the design department is to "think BIG" [read:  IMMENSE] ...id est:  multi-processors communicating in real-time with multi-processors in three and four dimensions, utilizing state of the art laser technology.  Nevertheless, you can make it easy for yourself by learning simple basic programs and segues and creating unique program augmentations with exquisite design features...your signature, if you will (as GUI is to Bill Gates).

Herein is some of the most important information which you will ever learn, and it is worth a veritable fortune:

Because of the nature of the Law of Cause and Effect, which invariably functions with mathematical precision (=), life and death decisions will be made by people who are dependent upon such complex programs, so be certain to memorize and apply the following protocol, for accuracy, whenever you design and/or adjust any program...

1. ALL of your premises must EQUATE (=).  Triple check.  If you can mathematically disprove any portion of any premise, the entire premise as stated is untrue and, as such, will disease your project results, if entered into the program.

2. Use a common base throughout your program [mathematical argument], even when your program involves comparing bases [examples Base 10 or Base Pi, Base 16 or Base 32  (for instance, albeit simplified:  (1 + 1 = 2)10,  whereas,  (1 + 1 = 11)16)], thereby, deflecting the proverbial "apples to oranges" argument.

3. It is a vital absolute truth (=) that ONLY that which equates (=) is true (=), symbolization notwithstanding ...proving, once again, that some truths are, in fact, absolute.  It is, also, a vital absolute truth (=) that each approximation is founded upon a minimum of one untruth, therefore, each approximation is technically untrue.

4. Base ALL of your decisions solely upon that which you know to be true (=);  "the name given to you and stated upon your birth certificate" is one example of such knowledge.  Do not enter as truth (=) any information which you are merely convinced is true;  rather qualify such information as an UNKNOWN, for instance:  information which your Science Professor told you is true without presenting the mathematical PROOF (=).

5. Use an accurate lexicon as one premise and specify to which lexicon you are referring, for purposes of interpretation of your program and results. For example, what is the definition of "is", actually?  Refer to full, original definitions and lexicons (which the Government has not influenced ...such as the Unabridged English Dictionary of 1776 used by Benjamin Franklin [Library of Congress]) for accuracy, id est:  "torture", "habeas corpus", "amend".

6. Establish your program to, automatically, mathematically prove (=) or disprove each statement, as new information enters the system while the program is running, and to filter all inaccuracies into the UNTRUE bin for further automatic sorting (into truths, untruths, and unknowns), automatic re-analysis, and the sorting of all truths (=) back into the program, while you are busy doing other things ...such as living!

You will want the finest educational background which you can feasibly obtain.  As such, you will want to keep your grades as high as possible and apply to Harvard, MIT, Yale, Princeton, et alii, for your college degree(s).  Harvard even offers an on-line Computer Science Baccalaureate for the genuinely self-disciplined student.  Those students who were not born into wealth can attend Harvard for $5,000 per year plus the cost of a good personal computer, software, books, and standard school supplies.  A little-known secret is the available option of taking as many as three courses during Harvard's seven-week Summer School, thereby, earning a degree, summer by summer, without leaving one's job.

For those who are unable to attend the Ivy League or the King of Science Schools [MIT], there are on-line, state, and private alternatives, some of which offer excellent, inexpensive programs.  Be aware, however, for potential pitfalls.  Make certain that you earn A's and that any credits which you earn are transferrable to Harvard, in case you should choose to earn your Masters or Doctorate within the Ivy League, for the most excellent education available and the concommitant money and prestige.

I guarantee that, if you follow the above sage advice, you will become a well-known name in Artificial Intelligence...and you will love the perks.

Now, go save the world!!!!

 

.
.
.
.
 
RE-DEFINING  LIFE  AND  DEATH
 
According to an article in the Washington Post, October 5, 2008, The Doctors Who Are Redefining Life and Death, regarding a new policy for killing patients for organ transplants "the public will accept the new policy since surveys suggest we're not hung up on whether the donor is dead."   

So I ask, since when does the life and comfort of a human being depend upon a survey suggesting that the public does not care???  Is this 'evil incarnate'? 

We are supposed to be a civilized society of people who, now, base their decisions upon truth, alone.  Yet, only that which equates is true ( = ), given that each approximation is founded upon a minimum of one untruth, therefore, each approximation is technically untrue.   In fact, according to the
New England Journal of Medicine, no scientist has ever been able to mathematically prove (such that it equates ( = )) the points at which birth and death occur, because they have had no way of knowing at which point
consciousness (and also, therefore, sentience) begins and completely, permanently ends.  That a physician would fudge the truth, even if his intentions toward
one patient are good, is anathema.

It is time that all physicians, and the AMA, MATHEMATICALLY PROVE (=) each stance regarding all medical issues, given that, as it is, they are turning this world into a frankensteinian version of
Logan's Run.  And the ones who suffer for it are the PURPORTED dead.   

Given that mind does not mathematically equal ( = ) brain and brain does not mathematically equal mind, the inability of the brain to register electrical activity is insufficient to the determination of death.  In fact, consciousness does not cease to exist while the physical brain exists anywhere, for brain and mind (which includes "the inner eye"), while not equating, are linked.  In fact, it is mathematically accurate (=) that sperm are tiny human tadpoles, each conscious, sentient, and, either, a male or female, and that death does not occur until one's entire consciousness ceases to exist, such as by cremation, given that that which equates(=) cannot be mathematically disproven.  Scientists have, historically, feared such truths given the inherent implication that each aborted baby suffered pain from the abortion.  It is time that we Americans cease lying to ourselves about it. 

We need to pass immediate legislation which requires that our scientists do the math (=), make certain that each of their premises equates (=), base all of their decisions solely upon that which is KNOWN (=) to be true, and make certain that the given base (such as Base 10) is consistent throughout their equation(s).  We must not allow for any little baby to have to scream "the silent scream" because of a poll, regardless of anyone's objectives. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
.

Does the media cause crime?

YES!!!!

In order to determine the power and reach of television, as this global economy begins to take hold within the further reaches of the world, one need not look too far for proof.

It is an issue which is close to my heart. When I was four years old, in 1950, I watched an NBC series of documentaries about Hitler's rise to power, including how he used media to manipulate the decisions of the masses. At that time, my young mind thought, "if Hitler could use television (which was rather new to households, then), books, newspapers, and films to cause people to do such horrible things, just think how much America can accomplish if we use the media to make the world a better place, instead. It was, then, that I first thought that, someday, I wanted to do just that. It was during the days of Edward R. Murrow, so my role model was of the highest calliber.

After a number of years of disappointment with the trusteeship of the free market media moguls, in 1990, I insisted that Congress and the FCC take action to minimize the quantity and severity of gratuitous violence on the airwaves, which they did. Unfortunately, however, they did nothing, at the time, to stem the rapid and extreme increase in mature/sexual content.

Today, we have a grandeloquent opportunity to raise the banner on behalf of the innocent children and trusting souls around an unsuspecting world. Each child has a right to his or her innocence. And each religious group has a right to have their most sacred beliefs respected within the media ...including reverence, itself.

We, each, need to "speak" loudly and cleary within our articles about the importance of creating international programming promoting The Golden Rule [the anti-thesis of which is the currently-popular Machiavellianism], the rights of the children to their innocence, and the sanctity of religious beliefs (whether or not everyone is a member of a particular religion).

The secular New World Order is making it increasingly difficult for people of faith to be comfortable within society. As such, a concerted effort is needed in order to provide all religions with sufficient safe "habitats" throughout the media.

For example: although I am a feminist and would not don a scarf on my head in order to visit Iraq, under ANY circumstances, I do respect the Muslim faith and Islam. As such, had I sufficient control, I would not allow any programming which showed women with bared heads on any Iraqi broadcast station...out of respect. People feel so strongly about their religious beliefs because they, desperately, do not want to go to "hell" or "hades", et caetera. As such, the place for a debate about such issues is not "in their faces"; rather, a news article, with an invitation to respond, might be sufficient to the debate.

Also, we need to request that the media giants create and/or distribute extensive education-oriented entertainment programming, books, et caetera, which respect the innocence of children, non-violence [especially against women and children], the religious rights of everyone, and peace on earth [The Golden Rule ...by the power of the inviolable Law of Cause and Effect].

Only then can the world reach it's true potential. There is 'GOLD' in those airwaves!

Fiji Water Company

Fiji Water Company

Fiji Water Company

THE GRIFFIN SUITE
Your Portal To Luxury