Herein, you will find serious news encapsulations
(just the facts)and updates, objective analyses, logical (=) debates, and conservative commentary regarding
the most profound matters of American policy, with the intention of resolving every resolvable problem unto the ultimate perfection
of the United States of America, as intended by our revered Forefathers.
Your input is always WELCOME!
A genuine public forum for in-depth education, discussion, deliberation, and ultimate agreement provides a fine base
for grass-roots activism.
“…sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting
for that Purpose, they shall be on Oathor Affirmation.”
Article II, Section 1 (“thefollowingOath…”):
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that
I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will, to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect
and defend the Constitution of the United States." [1972 Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary]
Article IV, Paragraph 3:
“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several
State Legislatures, and all executive
and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution;… .” çperiod ( . ) Therefore, each Senator, Representative, Supreme Court Judge, and each additional executive and judicial
officer is legally-required, by the Constitution, to take the following oath, punctuation perfect:
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that Iwill faithfully,
to the best of
my Ability, support THIS Constitution."
Amendment
XIV, Section 3:
“No
person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil
or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress,
or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of
any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same,
or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”
[Note: Technically (=), if the majority, even
unto all, of the members of the Congress are, at any time, engaged in insurrection or rebellion, whether or
not their intentions have been officially declared, one form of which is knowingly and intentionally violating
their literal oath (as stated within the Constitution, punctuation perfect), invoking, according to the ever-legal
Declaration of Independence as Supreme Law (Constitution: "Engagement"; DOI: "...whenever any Form of
Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new
Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem
most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."), corrective action by the people of the United States of America,
and/or by any natural-born citizen on behalf of The People of the United States of America, the entire
Congress can be replaced by appointment through an act of War on behalf of The People by the new President/Executive
until a new Congressional election can, properly, be effected, rendering the above-stated Congressional approval unlikely,
invalid, and unnecessary, whereas the new, temporarily-appointed Congress
can vote to remove such disabilty, at it's discretion.]
Amendment IV:
“shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but
upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation,… .”
All References To The Word
“Amendment” Within
The Constitution
Of The United States Of America
Please,
note that the word “amend” originally meant and, therefore, actually means ( = )“to mend a flaw”,
which was the understanding of our honorable Forefathers according to the full definitions within the Unabridged English Dictionary
of 1776, the common lexicon of the Colonies during the signing of the Declaration of Independence and unchanged prior to the
year 1790 [Library of Congress]; as such, only Amendments which were essential (“necessary”) to ‘
mending an actual flaw’ within the Constitution are technically ( = ) legal …and if, and only if, said Amendments
are/were processed solely according to the literal parameters of the Constitution.
Amendment:Article I, Section 7, Sentence 1:
“but the Senate may propose or concur
with Amendments as on other Bills.”
Article V:
“The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall proposeAmendments
to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States,
shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes,
as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or
by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress;
Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect
the first
and fourth
Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived
of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.” çperiod ( . )
“Period ( . )” means ( =
) “, this statement is complete, subject and predicate included.”
In other words, the period ( . ) means ( = ) ", that is ALL.").Note: The antithesis of “, this statement is complete, subject and predicate included.” is “,
et caetera." As such, there is no other reason for which, and manner by which, an Amendment can be legally ratified than those
specified within the Constitution of the United States of America; any Amendments which were not ratified solely within
the literal ( = ) confines of the Constitution of the United States of America are, technically ( = ), un-Constitutional,
and, therefore, technically ( = ), illegal.
.
Senators' Letter To DHS Secretary,
Janet Napolitiano
According to Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and
Bear Arms, Senators Coburn, Brownback, DeMint, Burr, Murkowski, Inhofe, and Vitter sent the following excerpt in
a letter to DHS Secretary Napolitano concerning DHS (targeting of conservatives as "right-wing extremists"):
" While we agree that we must fight extremists who are
both foreign and domestic we are troubled by some of the statements your department included as fact in the report titled
above, without listing any statistical data to back up such claims.
First, your report states that "Returning veterans
possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to rightwing extremists..." without listing any data to support such
a vile claim against our nation's veterans.
Second, the report states that the millions of Americans who believe in
the Second Amendment are a potential threat to our national security. Why? Do you have statistics to prove that law-abiding
Americans who purchase a legal product are being recruited by so-called hate groups?
Thirdly, the report states that
those that believe in issues such as pro-life legislation, limited government, and legal versus illegal immigration are potential
terrorist threats. We can assure you that these beliefs are held by citizens of all races, party affiliation, male and female,
and should not be listed as a factor in determining potential terror threats. A better word usage would be to describe them
as practicing their First Amendment rights.
Also, you list those that bemoan the decline of U.S. stature and the loss
of U.S. manufacturing capability to China and India as being potential rightwing extremists. We would suggest that the millions
of Americans who have lost their jobs in the manufacturing industry to foreign countries are not potential terror threats,
but rather honest Americans worried about feeding their families and earning a paycheck. "
Thank you, Senators, for understanding the difference!
.
1,000 WORDS
The Birth Certificate
.
.
On our page 1000 Words, note that which isabsent from Barack Obama's purportedly "Official" Hawaii'an Birth
Certificate, thus, invalidating this certificate as "official" proof of the location of Barack's birth;
id est: the embossed official seal of the State
of Hawaii and the Hawaii'an official's signature.
Page Two of the Certificate of Live Birth:
An official within the State of Hawaii Department of Health stated
that it is because they computerized and standardized all information, as of 2001 (note the timing), now, treating late
registrations identically to those of natural-born citizens, on-line only. Whereas, all previous "late registrants"
were handled in such a manner as to differentiate them
from those of the proven natural-born citizens (for whom official proof (proven fact (=)) of the date,
time, and location of their birth was signed by the attendant United States M.D.), the new on-line version includes, solely,
the sorts of information which are included within, both, the Certificate of Live Birth (for late registrants) and the Birth
Certificate (for those presenting the officially-signed (by the attendant M.D.) proof of location of birth).
The second page of the original two-page document, the original hard copies of which are stored within the archives, states
such distinguishing facts.
Barack Obama's original hard-copy, two-page birth
certificate (whether it be Hawaiian or Kenyan, which was originally on file and archived at HDOH, and a hard copy
of which he, probably, has at hand), for verification of location of natural citizenship (the required
verification of which was to be stated within Page Two of his archived Certificate
of Live Birth), has not, to date, been presented to the Congress.
For any Congress to set such an extreme precedent
as to seatanyone in the White House without, first, proving
(irrefutably (=)), and with public perusal, that he/she was, in fact, born within the United States
of America ...especially when even one American citizen genuinely questions it's validity... is anathema and an affront
to our precious Forefathers.
I approached this subject as a devotedly-objective newswoman.
The first few rumors, I noted. By the fifth rumor, I began to read the protestations more thoroughly. They began
to raise questions in my own mind, such as "Why is Obama spending such an exhorbitant sum of money in order
to keep his full, original Birth Certificate out of the courts?", "Why is an Attorney from Philadelphia, of all
places, suing over this issue?", "Why is Alan Keyes, of all people, so convinced that Obama was born in Kenya?",
"If Barack's own Grand Mother (and sister) said that Barack was born in Kenya, as some reports have stated, why would
the Congress ignore such reports? Does the Congress, honestly, believe that his own Grand Mother was lying
about it?" ...that would not make sense, yet, I have seen no evidence that our Congress has, collectively and objectively,
addressed the issue to any satisfactory conclusion; otherwise, NO American citizen would question the authenticity of
his purported "proof" ...yet, many do.
Until the Congress
publishes the original, officially-accepted, archived, proof (=) of Barack Obama's physical location at
the moment of his birth, they have not sufficiently appeased the people, for there are millions of Americans who do not
believe that he has the legal right to serve as the President of the United States of America. And, now, I have joined
their ranks. Voting that it is true is not a Constitutional option.
Because it is vital to American national security that our President
be a natural born citizen, over the course of time, I will accumulate sufficient proof (=) of the location of his
birth, in order to prove irrefutably (=)) whether or not Barack Hussein Obama II (by any name) was born
in Hawaii. I will publish all pertinent facts, here, at News America, for your perusal.
You may, also, follow me at Facebook at itequates or Jane
Smith, and/or Twitter @stillpresiding, for real-time updates and open debate questions. Please, feel free to participate, state your case, speak your peace (whether you be liberal
or conservative, Muslim or Atheist, male or female, et caetera), ask your questions, and/or corral any current debate
into a more compelling direction ...you can make itequates and/or @stillpresiding the debate vehicles of choice!
The Harvard Style Debate, a point-by-point debate, is my favorite. By the end, we will have, both, learned all
presented pertinent facts and someone's mind will be changed if, at first, we disagreed!
There are, at least, five vital absolute truths, "vital"
meaning "essential to life, itself".
1. It is an absolute truth that only that which equates
( = ) is true ...proving that some truths are, in fact, absolute. To wit, the simple statement "1 + 1 = 2" is not necessarily
true, whereas, the statement "In base ten, 1 + 1 = 2" is true.
2. It is an absolute truth ( = ) that each approximation
is founded upon a minimum of one untruth, and that, as such, it is an absolute truth that each approximation, in and of itself,
is technically untrue.
3. It is an absolute truth that, despite it's complexity,
there is only one original source of all of life, itself. Such can be represented mathematically as " 100% of the
components of all of life, itself " equal ( = ) "Set A" (for "The First Set") ...or "Set O" (for "Origin").
4. It is an absolute truth that, despite it's complexity,
there is only one original source of all of conscious life itself, the set of which is equal ( = ) to the original source
of all of life, itself (Set A).
5. It is an absolute truth that the inviolable and, as such,
inviolate Law of Cause and Effect is a physical law, invariably functioning with mathematical precision ( = ) solely in relation
to each positivity ( + ) and to each negativity ( - ), given that that which is truly neutral is not a negativity and,
therefore, does not, in and of itself, damage life. Each negative action, therefore, sets off a negative reaction in
every direction, including inwardly, from the point of origin of the negativity, creating friction, whereas, each positive
action sets off a positive reaction in every direction from the point of origin of the positivity, generating peace.
Thus, The Golden Rule functions to the greatest possible advantage
of all peoples and, was, therefore, proscribed within the Constitution of the United States of America within Article IV:
"...the year of our Lord seventeen hundred eighty seven". In
many ways, Machiavellianism functions in direct opposition to The Golden Rule. Given that Harvard College was created
to be a fine religious scholarly institution, that Machiavillianism is offered as a course of instruction, rather
than Machiavellianism versus The Golden Rule, is extremely destructive to life on Earth and, now, possibly
beyond.
It's now clear that President Obama, Big Labor, and their left-wing allies in Congress, will
attempt an unprecedented power grab that is a mortal threat to our economy and our democratic values.
This is being done in a stealth manner because its backers know that this bill will not pass
if the American people understand its destructive nature.
The Employee Free Choice Act, or "Card Check," would eliminate the right to vote by
private ballot when deciding whether to join a union, and it would undermine the right to freely negotiate contracts.
We can't tolerate this. We must stand for freedom, not fear in the workplace.
Saul Anuzis National Chairman, Save American Jobs Project American Solutions
P.S. Big labor has already spent hundreds of millions of dollars to push through this coercive,
job-killing bill. And they are prepared to spend millions more. With your generous financial support, we will run a grassroots,
internet-based campaign to get our message directly to the American people.
Do you have something to say? This is
a free country! Speak your peace. Family-friendly submissions of import are accepted and reprinted within
this site in unedited form: portaltoamerica@gmail.com.
.
.
What Happened To The Housing Market?
I have included, below, a copy of a proposed loan offering
which I discovered on the internet, by way of illustration of how corrupt the banking industry has become at the hand
of Congress, and a news excerpt illustrating the extreme danger of foreign investments in United States assets which,
constitutionally, belong solely to the American people.
This is not the first time I have called for Congress to
take immediate action to rein in the banking industry. Despite the recent credit legislation, as initiated
by Barack Obama and passed by the Congress, the new restrictions upon the credit industry are insufficient to the task
of correcting America's financial woes ...by greater than 85%... leaving CNBC commentators scratching their heads. They
are looking in the wrong direction for the sources of the problem. So is Bernanke. As such, I call upon the
Congress to, immediately, cap allinterest rates at "8.5% fixed annual with no additional
fees, retroactive to January 1, 2005", allow all financial institutions to stop issuing credit upon the 31st day of non-payment
without reimbursement in Bankruptcy Court, and void all dual and multiple citizenships and to cease issuing such.
When I was young during the early 1960's, 20% interest was
considered to be loan-sharking and was, therefore, illegal...especially in consideration of the fact that the Holy Bible warns
against usury (charging interest). Today, even Wells Fargo, a respectable bank, charges more than 30% interest to some of
it's poorest clients and 120% interest for a cash advance. To add to the extreme financial burdens of the lower middle-class
and poor, those who are forced to declare bankruptcy have no permanent reprieve from their indebtedness. Now, the increased
unemployment, which I had predicted two years prior, is placing large numbers of, otherwise, good-paying customers on
the delinquent list, month by month. Multiply their financial woes by the increases in their interest rates and
factor in the decreasing job market and productivity, subsequent price increases, ...a word to the wise:
This list is long!
As these and adjustable rates increase steadily due to late
payments, and late fees and overdraft fees accrue, the average American citizen, who secured the credit with the agreed to
lower interest rates in mind, will become unable to pay his or her bills sufficiently, causing Visa and Mastercard and other
creditors to cry "foul", asking for reprieve from the Government ..."bailout". Then, the burden on the people will increase
to such an extent that more foreclosures will be followed by personal bankruptcies at nearly unprecedented rates. Our nation
cannot sustain under such depletion of it's Treasury.
This problem has become so outrageous, mainly, due to dual
citizenships, which were illegal for most of our nation's history, and are, technically (=), unconstitutional, according to
the will of our Forefathers, who formally relinquished their British citizenship in order to become Americans. Today, however,
the aggregate of extremely wealthy socialist foreigners with enormous financial power and an agenda have corrupted our democratic
system of government to the point that America has become unrecognizable. As a more obvious example, if we sell our physical
real estate properties to foreign investors with dual citizenships, considering the current rate of such investments, we might
as well kiss America goodbye. It is, NOW, time for Congress to do all that they can possibly do to expurgate this unconstitutional
and destructive law, before America ceases to be, piece by piece.
This is a homeland security issue, as well. A citizen is
most loyal to his own nation, rather than to his second nation of dual citizenship.
Speaking of "The New World Order" ("International Government"
or whatever term Congress is currently calling it), are you aware that Time-Life had published a book illustrating
Hitler's plan for "world order", titled: The New Order, and that admittedly-socialist Franklin Delano
Roosevelt had Congress legislate that the Latin term for "New Order of the Ages" be printed upon our dollar bill?"
Within the United States of America, only gold and silver
are genuine payment in full of any government debt, despite Congressional cries to the contrary ...this is one over-riding
reason for not remaining in debt, as a nation. We need our gold and silver.
A Chinese government official who owns American securities,
can call the loan in and demand payment with gold ("You must pay the rent!", "I can't pay the rent!", "You MUST pay
the rent!"...remember?)
In this vein, please, note, also, that China is not so stupid
as to return America's GOLD to us once they, physically, have it within their borders...it is due to this type of reasoning
that China's elite culture was so wealthy throughout millenia. Never underestimate the Chinese ...nor anyone.
As such, the Congress NEEDS to eliminate dual citizenships,
effective immediately!...regardless of the cost...and keep ALL of our GOLD at home! There is no sufficient alternative.
Example 1:
CNBC News Report: 3/23/2007
...Japanese millionaire real estate investor ...(with
Dual Citizenship: Japan/USA)... owns dozens of office buildings in Tokyo...and has been buying and selling real estate in
Hawaii and California since the 1980s. He has been criticized for evicting American tenants from his rental homes on
short notice so he could sell the properties, as he did, in 2002, when he gave hundreds of California tenants 30 days to leave.
Two years later, he served eviction notices to tenants in 27 Oahu rental homes, mostly in pricey Hawaii Kai, saying they had
to leave within one month. He said he wanted to sell the houses to take advantage of rising prices. Some neighbors
speculate that he is trying to drive down real estate values so he can snap up even more homes. "Everyone's paying homage
to him, but in reality, he's the problem," said ...(a neighbor)... who lives down the street from one of his mansions.
Example 2:
* CASHNETUSA FEDERAL TRUTH IN LENDING DISCLOSURES: ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE: 402.69% The cost of your credit
as a yearly rate. Demand Feature: This obligation is payable on demand if you withdraw your consent to electronic communications.
*
(Note that the Federal Government is aware of the outrageous
402.69% annual interest rate ...Washington's only concern, in this regard, is that the company "state"
the rate.)
.
.
Jan 27 (Reuters) - Following are some of the companies exposed to the alleged $50 billion
securities fraud by Wall Street pioneer Bernard Madoff:
(Reporting by Reuters bureaus, compiled by Lisa Jucca, Steve Slater, Sweta Singh, and Martin Golan;
Editing by Andre Grenon) .
So, what really went wrong?
It began earlier, during the days of Enron, which sold
it's services even to the Government. Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) was initiated and touted by the Government as the cure for
business slight-of-hand at the expense of employees and investors. There was big money in 401K's, then.
SOX created an entirely new accounting career category.
The internal accountant verified that there were no loopholes within the system and the external accountant verified that
the company was in complete compliance. Or did they?
My experience with SOX accountants is that they can be
as easily deceived as a completely trusting baby. For instance, within my multi-Trillion dollar oil inventories analysis
and reporting processes, only an expert could have known which information is key and can potentially effect the company's
and clients' bottom lines, because they are dealing with weighting factors, temperature fluctuations, sediment factors,
shell expansion, and various other intricate multiples, each of which effects the final dollar amounts of each movement.
To wit, Exxon Mobil does not want Shell to profit from Exxon Mobil's oil during the delivery following within
a shared pipeline. Thus, accuracy and thoroughness are critical to many companies' bottom lines.
When a SOX accountant comes into a strange office
and asks which steps are taken to ensure accurate reporting, he or she is trusting the individual professional
to provide sufficient accurate information. I am skillful with books. I can even juggle books with the best
of them ...rather like a book-hacker. As such, I discovered 15 gaps within the SOX accountant's evaluation.
Each gap represented information which would have remained unverified and, in some cases, unreported had I not brought them
to his attention. Then, the external SOX accountant visited,
asked me which movements I would prefer that he audit, rather than demanding x number of random
movements for an objective audit. I am a
scrupulously honest person, which helps me to help my company and clients, yet, what if an unscrupulous person were to manipulate
such an unsecure system, as SOX is in practice, at the executive level of a major corporation, such as Goldman Sachs?
Ponzi schemes can result, as well as myriad other fancy "value-added" ballooning schemes. Evenutally, such
balloons naturally burst, to the detriment and chagrin of many.
Yet, Congress was convinced, by majority, that SOX was
the solution to the Enron problem. Enron employees lost their entire life savings and their jobs. After
SOX swept through the American business community, some people made massive fortunes while the American unemployment lines
began a dangerous spiral.
SOX is not irreparable. The Government must
make a concerted effort to close the gaps, immediately and for good, or eliminate SOX altogether as a colossal
waist of time, effort, energy, and money ...and as unnecessarily problematic.
So, now, I am wondering... as America and the world
are currently plummeting into The New World Order ["International Government" as "officially" titled in 1990], at an aggregate cost to
the American people of the entire true value of the U.S. Treasury, is it possible that National/Socialism will become the
global rule of the day, after all, as Hitler had devised, and that capitalism and, therefore, Wall Street will shrivel
into history? ...not to be taken lightly. Can America survive without Wall Street? Without Wall Street (as
a capitalistic expression of the right of American business persons to barter freely) there IS no America. So, watch
the stock market movements carefully. You are, metaphorically, seeing America gasping for fresh air prior to it's
imminent expiration.
What to do... As I have previously stated, more than twice,
the only way to save America, at this point, is to expurgate each and every quasi-constitutional and unconstitutional law,
based upon the full, literal (=) definitions, word for word, punctuation included, within the original lexicon used by the
Signatories of our Constitution and Declaration of Independence ...the Unabridged English Dictionary of 1776 which was used
by Benjamin Franklin [Library of Congress], who signed both documents. This particular lexicon was the common lexicon
of the day throughout Colonial America.
Bear in mind that democracy and socialism are not identical and that
there is no such thing as socio-democracy. Once socialism, in any form, has infected any governing system,
pure democracy ceases to exist within that Government. All socialism exists outside of the literal parameters
of the Constitution of the United States of America, as defined above.
America is currently turned inside out. Our Government is supposed
to be collecting revenues solely from imports. NAFTA reversed the Constitutional directive. Expurgate NAFTA.
The only persons to object are those who are procuring a fast fortune by abusing their privileges. Yet, even American
business owners need to understand that America is all that can protect them, in the long run.
.
.
.
AMERICAN SOVEREIGNTY
There was no other reason for our forefathers to create the
Declaration of Independence, which is a legally-protected document as accorded by the literal ( = ) parameters of the Constitution
of the United States of America, than to establish the sovereignty of the United States of America. Despite the attempts
of recent administrations to establish, by various means, a New World Order, it is an absolute truth ( = ) that the United
States of America will continue to exist as a nation only for as long it remains sovereign; any nation which is in possession
of less than it's absolute sovereignty, is a country in name only and has no legal validity as a nation.
In this light, alone, settlers to the west adopted "popular
sovereignty" as their rights while "squatting" on previously unexplored territories. The Queen of England is a Sovereign.
Thus, American people came to understand that within their sovereign nation, they, too, were Sovereigns. Each citizen
a King or Queen, as our Forefathers wanted.
Some issues with popular sovereignty have taken hold during
the past several decades, however, which need to be addressed. Abuses of such rights and freedoms are leading down a
dark and dismal path, as a nation. For instance, "Nation States" are not "nations"; rather, "Nation States" are
"states" within a larger union. However, their is no union on Earth, even if it is a so-called "International Government"
stationed within New York City, Geneva, Berlin, or elsewhere, which has the right to usurp the sovereignty of the American
Government.
Aired on May 21, 2006, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice,
during a news interview with George Stephanopoulos, for ABC, while referencing the international community within the parameters
of the tenets of the United Nations, called the United States of America a "state". I, personally, do not recall
that "we, the people" of the United States of America, by way of our locally-elected Legislators, have ever been granted a
national vote to, either, establish an amendment to devolve the United States of America from the status of a sovereign nation
to that of a mere "state" among many member "states" of an international nation nor to effectively so undermine our beloved
nation ...and, I have no doubt, neither do you.
If "ignorance of the law is no excuse", this situation, therefore
and unfortunately, is, technically, high treason on the part of each member of the Congress of the United States of America
who, albeit unwittingly, voted to pass such unconstitutional measures, however, ambiguously worded, and on the part of each
President who is and/or was in position and under oath to "preside" and denounce, as unconstitutional, such an unlawful action
...and I am not afraid to be the one to say so.
Be, and remain, mindful that not all wars, historically,
were "declared". Members of the New World Order and international lobbyists, among others, are, currently, waging
a covert war against the sovereignty of the United States of America; a war which is significantly funded by international
businessmen with dual citizenships, effectively as "silent partners" ...in part through massive campaign contributions, legal
counsel, lobbying campaigns, public speaking and business trysts for various members of our government to foreign lands, et
alii. Though most of these people have subscribed to the New World Order as innocents, there are those who knew exactly
that which they were doing with regard to the organization and implementation of the effective dissemination of American sovereignty
and to replacing democracy with socialism and, ultimately, nationalism.
Time Life Books published the book, titled "The New Order",
masterfully describing, step-by-step, Hitler's plans to re-organize society on a global scale, beginning on the regional level.
If you take the time to objectively read this book, you will inevitably conclude that The New World Order, in function, is,
merely, the modern globalization of Hitler's original plan ...in large measure, precisely as he had envisioned it. Thus,
some patriots, of late, have been publicly decrying recent Administrations as NAZI-istic.
We, the people, need, desperately, for the United States
of America to be, immediately, returned to it's full sovereign status, in actuality, sans "lip service". Contacting
your Representative, Senator, Vice President, the President, and every news department in America, will, in fact, help toward
this end. They will listen to you and take action when provided with sufficient accurate information which
is presented in a meaningful manner.
One has no popular sovereignty while one's nation is not
sovereign. Yet, in 1990, George Bush Senior signed a United Nations Resolution which granted "any person or group, foreign
or domestic, uniformed or ununiformed, armed or unarmed, the right to enter into any American home and confiscate weapons
without recourse in any court of law, including The World Court" [C-Span, as written on screen, January 1990].
Sovereignty? Nearly as precious as you are!
.
Quote Me
Thomas Jefferson, Signatory of the Constitution
and President of the United States of America
My
reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.
It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. A principle
which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world.
The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those
who would not.
I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from
wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.
When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall become as corrupt as Europe.
Banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties thanstanding armies. If the American
people ever allowprivate
banksto control the issue of their currency, first by inflation,
then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until
their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.
No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms
is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.
The
tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
RE-FOREST THE
EARTH
The Earth was once lush
with trees. Even a mere 100 years ago, the planet was heavily forested and wooded. Since then, businesses the
world over have been stripping our lands of our beautiful and ancient trees, deforesting the Earth and leaving us gasping
for fresh air. Yet, we have a collective opportunity to begin a national and global tradition of reforesting the Earth.
One
of the most Earth-friendly acts which you can take, each spring, is to purchase 100 seedling trees for $1 from the United
States Government, giving some to your friends and planting the remainder. Your new trees will grace the environment
for hundreds of years to come. By the time you have reached your senior years, then, you will have planted a veritable
woods for the birds, squirrels, and other woodland creatures. How much more beautiful can a gift be?!
Within fifty years, merely because you are so
mindful and generous, homes and fields around America will begin to appear like fairy-book homes and woods, beautiful
and entrancing.
Such beautiful little trees can, readily and cost-effectively,
be purchased on-line, as well, saving you gas money and helping to freshen the atmosphere.
Another lovely and Earth-friendly gift idea is
to expand upon Johnny Appleseed's quest to provide poor people and woodland creatures, for many generations, fresh apples
to eat. For instance, even though, today, they can easily walk to the grocery store for meat, hunters tend to advance their
particular brand of violence by saying that, "if the populations of deer are not 'thinned out', many deer will die of starvation".
However, if the deer live within an environment of apple trees, they do not starve ...rather, they thrive!
As such, all of the little Bambi's of the world
will be grateful for the gift of apple trees planted in yards, parks, woods, and forests. And, as word spreads, the poor will
be able to grab a simple, nutritious bite to eat ...without having to scuffle through garbage bins.
Moreover, whenever you eat a fresh (not refrigerated)
apple, if you save and plant the seeds in planters, by next Christmas you will have a wonderful set of inexpensive gifts for
your family and friends to plant in their yards or local woods, spreading the wealth and good cheer. Some might even
enjoy beginning a small business selling apple seeds, seedlings, and/or young apple trees!
You see ...it is an easy
project to complete if we each contribute a little.
How
lovely
is the forested Earth!
Colorado in the Spring-time
How Multi-Nationals Have Altered The Business Landscape
During the years within which our nation was being designed,
our Forefathers agreed that, in exchange for the honor of American citizenship, one must relinquish his or her citizenship
rights and/or subjugation to any other government, including to that of their foreign homeland. Our Forefathers' experience,
in this vein, was that of immigrant colonists from England, France, Spain, Germany, Wales, Holland, Norway, et caetera.
Until after World War II, this solo
citizenship law was considered a given, as well it ought to have been. With the increasing sophistication of the United Nations,
however, our Congress was, somehow, convinced by high-priced lobbying efforts, without input from "We the People", to permit
dual-citizenships. America has not been the same since.
Today, wealthy moguls and politicians from our former enemies
(id est: China, Japan, Germany, North Korea, et alii), have voting rights, real estate purchase rights, and, more often than
not, diplomatic immunities within America, such that nearly 50% of Manhattan is owned by foreigners and nearly 25% of American
soil is owned by foreign heads of state.
The voting rights, alone, of such dual- and multi-citizenship
carriers have adulterated the political landscape to that of "member state" [Condoleezza Rice] of the "International Government",
rather than that of "America, the world's only Super-Power".
As a current example of the negative consequences of multi-nationalism:
a Japanese mogul living in Japan, who purchases foreclosed homes and mansions, is forcing Americans from their homes, breaking
entire estates into smaller units, and selling the smaller properties in order to extract higher profits; beloved properties
of elderly people are being sequestered by the American Government, on behalf of foreign business owners, for conversion to
shopping malls - and entire towns are on the slate for such conversions; and, politically, "The New World Order" [George Herbert
Walker Bush / French President Nicolas Sarkozy] is advancing plans to combine Canada, the United States of America, and Mexico
into one "nation state", called the North American Union, to produce a North American currency, called the Amero, and to,
then, produce a "world coin". If you read the Time Life Book "The New Order", regarding Hitler's written plan for world domination,
you will be able to "see" that The New World Order has, already, wound it's way into nearly every nook and cranny of American
government, today.
It has become clear that multi-nationalism is one of America's greatest travesties! Immigrants from socialist nations understand
socialism, while those from fascist nations understand fascism, et caetera, whether or not they approve of them. Yet, it is
the rare immigrant who fully understands and appreciates the sacrifices which our Forefathers made for our perfectly-designed,
pure American republic, which is reliant upon the power of pure democracy at the local level.
So, where did America go in this crafty hustle? Did it begin when Dr. Henry Kissinger, with
his dual American/German citizenships, sold America short by handing hard-fought South Viet Nam over to the Communist Chinese,
with nary a whimper ...as it appears? Or did it begin when Congress allowed business groups to use the Congress as their
extended world-wide sales force, rather than referring the all such lobbyists to the Department of Commerce, according to
[literal (=)] Constitutional Law? Or when oil company lobbyists convinced them that imperialism is alright ...for as
long as it is officially called "Protecting Vital National Interests"?
No foreign-born citizen of another nation is going to be as loyal to America as American-born Americans and foreign-born
American citizens who have relinquished their foreign citizenship status(es) ...which is, precisely, the reason for our Forefathers
having established such a concrete rule. At the time, all nations had the same rule, given that LOYALTY is essential
to the continuation of ANY nation.
Moreover, dual citizens and multi-nationals have more than one vote on the world stage, leaving everyone else with a single
vote disadvantaged, which is entirely un-American. One person, one vote is integral to The American Way.
There is only one solution to this horrendous error on the part of our government "representatives" and officials.
All dual-citizenships and all multiple-citizenships must be, immediately, declared null and void,
and all American real estate returned, immediately, to the American-born People of the United States of America,
under whose guardianship it, rightfully, belongs.
America's
Wild Horses And Burros In Danger
The government's
over-management of wild animals is devolving into the disappearance of some of the world's most beautiful species. We
must stop, NOW! If
we do not, another 30,000 horses and burros are scheduled for destruction, soon.
Instead, we need to
tell the Bureau of Land Management to parcel private property, only, or to close it's doors ...because it has become a total
nightmare through the years, all good intentions notwithstanding.
According to the
New England Journal of Medicine, no scientist has ever been able to mathematically prove (=) that animals are not as inherently
intelligent and sentient as Homo sapiens. Moreover, consciousness, in and of itself, cannot technically (=) be inferior
to itself [mind does not mathematically equal (=) brain, and brain does not equal (=) mind]. Therefore, who are we to consider ourselves a compassionate, intelligent society while being so careless and
cruel with regard to the gift of our awesome wild horses and burros?
If we are genuinely
concerned about the animals' inability to find sufficient food, we, as a nation, need to plant apple and pear trees, in abundance.
Such a project ought to provide the Bureau of Land Management with sufficient opportunity to distribute their funds.
Or is the real point
that some wealthy rancher finds the wild horses and burros a hindrance to his profitability while leasing/using/managing Government
lands and while the Management of some Chinese rendering plant within Anmerica (boiling puppy, kitten, and horse
carcasses, et alii, for fertilizers, et caetera, such as that within politically-corrupt Vernon, California) is willing to
pay for additional animal "fodder" for his client orders?
We need to, each,
take the time to watch all of the YouTube "animal abuse" videos (live, behind-the-scenes coverage).
It will forever change your life ...and, possibly, America... once you do.
Americans across the
heart-land are disheartened, and there is absolutely no excuse for any Government group/entity/official to euthanize or sell
our precious wild animals. Rather, we need to plant fruit trees throughout our National Parks. Even wolves
will eat fruit!
Henceforth, business
persons must be permitted to purchase and/or lease only private lands. Having worked as a senior analyst within
the oil industry, I know that no wealthy businessman/entity needs Government lands in order to make a profit, because of the proverbial Milk
Shake Effect, wherefore, one man's oil is usurped by means of his neighbor's slant. Such businessmen are merely taking advantage
of the "free ride" which Congress so graciously provides.
The Congress and
the officials and staff members within the Bureau of Land Management need to value life above the satisfaction of "fat cat"
ranchers, et alii.
Our wild horses are
as important to the American legacy as apple pie, Johnny Apple Seed, and Benjamin Franklin. And their lineage is fine.
Let them be. Yet, do not transport any to lands near Yellowstone, where hungry wolves dwell.
.
Are Liberals Using The Supreme Court To Destroy The
Constitution?
According to the Unabridged English Dictionary of 1776
used by Dr. Benjamin Franklin, the word "literal" does not mean "liberal", the word "definition" does not mean "interpretation",
and, therefore, the term "literal definition" does not mean "liberal interpretation".
Until the vast majority of the members of our Congress
are devoted to functioning completely within the literal ( = ) parameters of the Constitution of the United States (as defined
above), as legally required, the Democratic Party will continue to become increasingly liberal with impunity, the Republican
Party will ride the coat-tails of Democratic Liberalism into international ownership of American lands to the disassembling
of our nation (which is, already, in progress), and the people of our precious nation will be, increasingly, engulfed by Socialism
and Nationalism and, ultimately, destroyed by the, so-called, New World "Order". It is no wonder that smaller foreign nations
are clamboring for relief from the pressures of succumbing to this secular alliance. The American citizenry is as frail as
they, in this respect. The New World Order is a system which has become far too unmanageable by American-born citizens ...even
by those in Congress.
Where are the courts within this scenario...? The liberals
attorneys somehow convinced other legal minds to ignore the periods at the ends of the sentences within the Constitution and,
almost instantly, all prior visible obstacles to full-out liberalism disappeared.
On the other hand, once the Republican Party devotes
itself, completely, to the literal ( = ) parameters of the Constitution of the United States of America, punctuation included
(given that the period at the end of any sentence, actually, means "This sentence is complete, as stated, including subject
and predicate."), the Republican Party will, rightfully, recapture the confidence of the American voters, across all party
lines, and the Democratic Party will fall into line, quickly, in order to not appear undemocratic, while, by the power of
the inviolate Law of Cause and Effect, our system of governance will, automatically, correct itself to perfection, as it was,
flawlessly, designed to do. Our nation is called a republic ("return to the public") within the Constitution, yet, on the
local level, it functions as a pure democracy, so that everyone's voice is heard and everyone's needs are satisfied by, and
throughout, the process...though only while the literal ( = ) parameters of the Constitution are not being violated.
Who could object? Ah, yes... the foreign-born American
Citizens with dual citizenships and enormous wallets, as well as certain foreign nationals with equally enormous wallets.
Please, note that not all wars are declared and our nation is, currently, functioning almost solely outside of the literal
( = ) parameters of The Constitution of the United States of America, at this point, and, as such, outside of the parameters
of The Constitution of the United States of America. It is naive of anyone to conclude that those powerful puppeteers with
dual citizenships do not know, precisely, that which they are doing ...what they do not know is that the long term result
is massive destruction and world wars. Which begs the question, "Do they care about the future of the world as it pertains
to their, yet, unborn descendants, as our Forefathers did?" They, too, are, inherently, capable of thinking as logically as
we, and, as such, they, too, naturally gravitate toward peace. Given sufficient, accurate information, then, they will
draw correct conclusions.
Thus, the world, at large, needs to be sufficiently
educated about the extraordinary beauty of the literal parameters of The Constitution
of the United States of America. For it is a system which, when applied with mathematical precision ( = ), will function to,
automatically, perfect America...and any other nation, or nations, to which this particular system is applied. However, we
cannot, logically, expect other nations to, willingly, adopt an identical system of governance if they cannot, first, see
our system succeeding within our own homeland.
It is not enough to say that we, as Americans, adhere
to this brilliant Constitution, while we violate it's true (literal) parameters, at nearly every turn. Yes, Americans are,
in general, wealthier than the majority of the global citizenry. At the current rate of global dispursements, it
will not be for much longer. To wit, how many of the pork-barrel project funds will be allocated to companies
headquartered in foreign lands? Wherever the gold
goes, so goes the nation! ...China is an ancient civilization because they never lost sight of
this vital fact.
Moreover, true wealth is not measured in dollars
alone. Rather true wealth is measured in terms
of the greatest possible safety, comfort, freedom, financial security, love, happiness, et caetera. Legislate that,
if you can! Oh, that is right , we already had.
